
Descent of the Holy Spirit, Holger Schué, Pixabay.
Click here to read today’s Sunday Mass Readings.
Now when the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent them Peter and John, who went down and prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Spirit, for it had not yet fallen upon any of them; they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit. Acts of the Apostles, 8:14-17.
Click on words highlighted in red for further information.
- Today’s first reading is intriguing in that it seems to elaborate on the presence of God’s Holy Spirit at baptism and, it seems, how the full presence of the Holy Spirit required a separate ritual. Yes, God’s Holy Spirit descends on us at our Baptism, as was the case at Jesus’ Baptism by John the Baptist. That told the Lord that he was, first, the Son of God (“This is my beloved Son”), giving him his identity and we become children of God at that time. Then the Holy Spirit of God came upon him, anointing him, designating God’s will for him: to fulfill his task as the Messiah of Israel and the world – in other words, he was given his vocation, and, depending on our gifts from God, we become Christ to the world at that moment, our vocation. The Holy Spirit did indeed anoint him (Messiah means “Anointed”) as the Holy Spirit did with each of us at our Baptism. But we have to note today’s first reading; “that they might receive the Holy Spirit, for it had not yet fallen upon any of them“. So note today the critical distinction between Baptism and the sacrament of Confirmation: “Then they laid hands on them”. That does not happen at Baptism but it does when we are confirmed. Also note a further distinction. Philip was the minister who was baptizing the Samaritans; he was one of the newly chosen deacons (see last Sunday). It required the apostles Peter and John (and later, bishops) to go there to invoke the Holy Spirit fully upon them. We are dealing here with one of the scriptural foundations of the sacrament of Confirmation, given to this day by a bishop (save under special conditions, when it may be performed by a priest, especially at the Easter Vigil).
- We should also note that this all took place in Samaria. The Jews of Galilee and Jerusalem considered Samaritans to be Jewish heretics, betrayers of Jewish identity. Samaritans tolerated marriage between themselves and foreigners, for example; Jewish tradition frowns on that to this day! So the mission of these first believers in the Lord in deliberately traveling to Samaria to preach was remarkable, and an indication of things to come. Actively seeking Samaritans to The Way (the first name given to Christianity) certainly pointed to the future history of the church, welcoming just about everyone! It certainly set the stage for our world-wide Christian community, not linked to a particular city or ethnic group as are many, even very large, religions seem to be. Now for that gospel reading. Jesus is talking about God’s Most Holy Spirit, and at this point I clad myself in spiritual armor and plunge into controversy.
- Jesus, in our English translation of the Greek original texts of the New Testament, consistently talks of the Holy Spirit as “he”. In today’s reading, for example: “…the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot accept, because it neither sees nor knows him” and “But you know him, because he remains with you, and will be in you”. Please note the following. In Hebrew, the word for Spirit is ruach (רוּחַ) and is grammatically feminine. Thinking of Jesus’ baptism, where the Spirit descended on the Lord “like a dove“, in Hebrew Yonah (יוֹנָה), dove, is grammatically feminine. At Pentecost, where the disciples, with Our Lady, experienced the Spirit as tongues of fire. Fire in Hebrew is aysh, אֵשׁ and is primarily feminine, and is the same word for “wind”, which was also experienced by those same people. The word tongue is also grammatically feminine, lashon לָשׁוֹן. Jesus spoke Aramaic, the common language in Palestine at that time. It was very closely related to Hebrew in his day, but Hebrew was rather conservative and closely aligned with religious life (a little, perhaps, like the way we say the “Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name….” But my point is, that if Jesus could have heard our English translation of the Greek (where, by the way, the Greek word for Spirit, πνεῦμα (pneuma), is in fact, neuter, and so the Holy Spirit should be grammatically referenced as “it”), he would be at the very least, surprised, and would wonder what our problem was! If you accept all that, the Trinity therefore contains a feminine principle and inspires our human reality much more satisfactorily! Pope Leo has encouraged dioceses throughout the world to adopt Synodal Evangelization: (and) urges them to look for effective forms of evangelization in a synodal spirit, emphasizing a “pastoration that is solidarity, empathetic, discreet and non-judgmental”. I sent a note about my thought here to our local bishop, suggesting a diocesan-wide consideration of what would probably be quite a revolutionary but uniting concept, but heard nothing back! But doesn’t it make sense? A Blessed Trinity with strength, fidelity and love (Father, Son and Spirit) embracing a highly positive masculinity and femininity all at once.
- Perhaps 100 years from now… But:

The Holy Trinity, Church of St, James, Urschalling, Bavaria, Germany. A highly intriguing representation of the Holy Trinity from the Middle Ages….
DO YOU KNOW THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE THIS REFLECTION?
PLEASE FORWARD IT TO THEM.
THANK YOU.
Reflections on next Sunday’s Mass Readings will be posted on Wednesday.
Please send your reactions to: RogerJohn@aol.com
©SundayMassReadings.com

















